Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 30.06.2025 12:03

Let’s just make it real clear:
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Don't Like The New Xbox Game Hubs? Here's How To Turn Them Off - Pure Xbox
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Russia can stop this any time.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
All returning athletes in Tony Hawk's Pro Skater 3 + 4 revealed - ESPN
Just in the last 5 years:
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
What’s next?
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
When reading can – and can't – help with mental health - BBC
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
AMC Theaters to Run Even More Commercials Before Movies Play - Bloomberg.com
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Thank you.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Google AI Mode traffic data added to Search Console reporting - Search Engine Land
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Existing PS Plus Members Using Clever Trick to Get a Discount - PlayStation LifeStyle
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.